The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – April 2025
This blog dives into the world of comedy podcasts, offering a glimpse into the diverse range of topics covered, the unique perspectives shared, and the engaging conversations that unfold. From insightful discussions about the state of the comedy industry to hilarious anecdotes and personal reflections, these podcasts provide a platform for laughter, thought-provoking insights, and a deeper understanding of the human experience. Explore the world of comedy podcasts and discover a wealth of entertainment, inspiration, and unexpected wisdom. Dive in and listen to learn more!
The 10 Best Comedy episodes
#2303 – Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
This podcast explores the complexities of current world events, particularly the wars in Israel and Ukraine, by bringing together diverse perspectives and challenging established narratives while examining the role of algorithms, media bias, and the limits of US influence.
This podcast delves into the complexities of current world events, particularly the wars in Israel and Ukraine, by bringing together individuals with differing viewpoints. The host, a self-described "bisexual of politics," aims to foster rational conversations and explore diverse perspectives, but faces questions about potential bias in guest selection. The discussion highlights the increasing presence of non-expert voices on podcasts, often presenting counter-historical narratives and challenging established viewpoints. The podcast explores the impact of perpetual war on public discourse, highlighting the erosion of trust in institutions and the tendency for individuals to question established narratives, potentially leading to the embrace of fringe views. The conversation touches upon the role of libertarians in public discourse, comparing them to "bisexuals of politics" for their tendency to embrace diverse viewpoints, sometimes at the expense of clear stances. The podcast draws parallels between the Twitter algorithm's influence on content consumption and the potential for similar algorithmic biases in podcasting, suggesting that sensationalist and fringe views may be amplified due to their click-generating potential. The host expresses concern about the underrepresentation of pro-Ukraine and pro-Israel arguments in public discourse, suggesting that the algorithm may favor conspiratorial narratives over more nuanced perspectives. The podcast emphasizes the importance of understanding the context and origin causes of historical events, arguing that focusing solely on sensationalist details can lead to a distorted understanding of complex situations. The discussion explores the "fog of war" in the context of the post-Soviet era, highlighting the complexities of navigating international relations and the potential for misinterpretations and misunderstandings. The podcast discusses the concept of "strategic empathy" in international relations, emphasizing the need to understand the perspectives of other nations while acknowledging the limitations of American influence in shaping global events. The podcast explores Moynihan's rule, which suggests that the number of human rights violations in a country is inversely proportional to the number of claims of such violations, highlighting the tendency for liberal democracies to focus on their own shortcomings while overlooking those of authoritarian regimes. The conversation delves into the Russian invasion of Ukraine, presenting two key points: a 2008 memo from Joe Biden warning about the potential for war due to NATO expansion and a 2021 draft treaty from Vladimir Putin offering to avoid invasion if Ukraine wasn't brought into NATO. The speaker emphasizes the human suffering in Ukraine, highlighting the ongoing war and its impact on the Ukrainian people. They argue that the conflict is not simply about NATO expansion but about a country enduring a devastating war. The conversation delves into the collapse of the Soviet Union, acknowledging the role of US involvement in Afghanistan but emphasizing that other factors, including the inherent flaws of communism as an economic model, contributed to its downfall. The speaker criticizes US foreign policy, arguing that the US often uses democracy as an excuse for intervention when it serves its strategic interests. They point to examples of US support for corrupt regimes and interference in other countries' affairs. The discussion turns to Qatar's influence in the US, highlighting Qatar's significant financial investments in the country and its alleged attempts to influence US policy. They question why this interference receives less attention than other foreign interventions. The conversation focuses on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the speaker arguing that Hamas bears primary responsibility for the recent escalation of violence. They criticize Hamas's actions and its use of Gaza as a base for launching attacks against Israel. The speaker expresses concern about the global response to the October 7th attacks in Israel, arguing that many people have excused or denied Hamas's actions. They attribute this to a narrative that demonizes Israel and its people. The speaker discusses the Palestinian people's right to self-determination, including the right to make bad decisions. They argue that Hamas's actions, such as stockpiling rockets and launching attacks against Israel, have contributed to the ongoing conflict. The speaker emphasizes the importance of first-hand experience in understanding complex situations, arguing that one should visit a place before speaking about it extensively. They criticize the speaker's lack of experience in the region. The speaker reiterates their belief that both Palestinians and Israelis have agency in the conflict. They acknowledge that Palestinians could have made better decisions but also highlight the role of Israeli actions in shaping the situation. The speaker criticizes a perceived framing bias in discussions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, arguing that there is a difference in the value placed on Israeli and Palestinian lives. They point to the disproportionate attention given to the October 7th attacks compared to the ongoing suffering in Gaza. The speaker challenges the use of the term "concentration camp" to describe the Gaza Strip, arguing that it is inaccurate and insensitive given the high youth population in the area. They emphasize that the Gaza Strip is not comparable to Auschwitz. The speaker acknowledges the brutality of the war in Gaza but argues that it is not the most brutal war of our time. They compare the death toll in Gaza to that of the Syrian Civil War, suggesting that the conflict in Syria has been more devastating. The speaker outlines the two main goals of the war in Gaza: retrieving hostages and destroying Hamas. They acknowledge the complexity of these objectives and the challenges involved in achieving them. The speaker questions the moral implications of the war in Gaza, highlighting the suffering of innocent civilians. They challenge the speaker's justification for the war, arguing that the destruction of Hamas should not come at the cost of innocent lives. The speaker discusses the difficulty of eliminating Hamas, arguing that it is likely to be replaced by another similar group. They emphasize the counterproductive nature of killing innocent civilians, as it can lead to further radicalization and resistance. The speaker argues that the consequences of war are felt by all involved, not just those who initiated it. They criticize the speaker's focus on the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza while minimizing the impact of the war on Israeli soldiers. The speaker acknowledges that civilian casualties are inevitable in war but questions the acceptability of such losses. They argue that the destruction of Hamas should not come at the cost of innocent lives. The conversation returns to the Syrian Civil War, with the speaker criticizing US involvement in the conflict. They highlight the US's support for Al Qaeda and ISIS and argue that US actions have contributed to the instability in the region. The speaker reiterates their concern about the moral implications of the war in Gaza, arguing that the destruction of Hamas should not come at the cost of innocent lives. They challenge the speaker's willingness to accept civilian casualties as a necessary price. The speaker challenges the speaker's claim that the Israeli military does not intend to kill civilians in Gaza. They argue that the use of bombs in densely populated areas, even if based on intelligence, inevitably leads to civilian casualties. The speaker describes the reality of war in Gaza, highlighting the presence of weapons and tunnel entrances in civilian buildings. They argue that the destruction in Gaza is partly a result of Hamas's tactics, such as booby-trapping buildings. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the limits of US influence in global affairs. They argue that the US should be cautious about intervening in complex conflicts, as it often lacks a clear understanding of the situation and its potential consequences. The discussion begins by acknowledging the US's involvement in Syria, specifically John McCain's visit to meet with rebels, but emphasizes that the US has not been a significant player in the conflict. The speaker argues that Russia and Iran have been the primary actors, with Iran's influence extending beyond Syria. The conversation shifts to the US's broader influence in the Middle East. The speaker challenges the notion that the US is always the primary actor, highlighting the actions of other countries like Russia and Iran. The speaker also argues that the US has not had the staying power or intelligence to achieve the impact it aims for in the region. The discussion focuses on the US's involvement in regime change in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and Libya. The speaker acknowledges the US's role in these events but argues that the US's actions have not always been successful and have sometimes created vacuums that have been exploited by other actors. The speaker presents a theory about a neo-conservative strategy to overthrow seven governments in five years, citing a claim by four-star general Wesley Clark. The speaker argues that the overthrow of Gaddafi in 2011 was not a purely humanitarian mission but was part of this larger strategy. The speaker argues that the overthrow of Gaddafi was a disaster for the prospects of world peace, particularly because it occurred after he had given up his nuclear weapons program. The speaker suggests that the situation in Libya after Gaddafi's overthrow is a cautionary tale about the dangers of regime change. The discussion returns to the role of Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle in US foreign policy. The speaker argues that attributing American foreign policy to these individuals is a conspiracy theory that has no basis in reality. The speaker also criticizes the tendency to focus on individuals with Jewish names when discussing conspiracies. The speaker emphasizes the importance of context and nuance when discussing US foreign policy. The speaker argues that it is important to avoid simplistic explanations and to recognize the complexity of the issues involved. The speaker also criticizes the tendency to reduce complex issues to conspiracy theories. The speaker discusses the responsibility of public figures to avoid promoting hate speech. The speaker argues that it is important to be aware of the potential impact of one's words and to avoid using language that could be interpreted as hateful or discriminatory. The speaker also acknowledges the difficulty of navigating these issues in the public square. The speaker discusses the role of Israel in the current conflict and its impact on social media. The speaker argues that Israel's actions have contributed to an increase in hate speech and conspiracy theories online. The speaker also expresses concern about the potential for this hate speech to lead to violence. The speaker concludes by reiterating the responsibility of public figures to counter hate speech. The speaker argues that it is important to speak out against hate speech and to challenge the narratives that promote it. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of being careful about the language one uses and the ideas one promotes.
#2304 – Gary Brecka
This podcast explores the root causes of chronic disease, the benefits of hydrogen gas as a biohack, the importance of microvascular circulation, and the limitations of traditional healthcare practices, advocating for a holistic approach to health and wellness.
This podcast delves into the complex world of chronic disease, exploring its root causes and potential solutions. The hosts challenge conventional wisdom about food, nutrition, and healthcare, advocating for a more holistic approach to health and wellness. They discuss the harmful effects of processed foods, particularly seed oils, and the concept of micro-poisoning, arguing that the cumulative effects of toxins can lead to chronic health problems. They also emphasize the importance of community and sense of purpose in promoting longevity and reducing isolation. The podcast highlights the benefits of hydrogen gas as a biohack, explaining its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and its potential for improving circulation, cognitive function, and overall health. They discuss various ways to incorporate hydrogen gas into one's routine, including drinking hydrogen water, bathing in hydrogen gas, and using hydrogen generators. The hosts also delve into the importance of microvascular circulation, explaining its role in delivering oxygen and nutrients to tissues and removing waste products. They argue that many health problems, including high blood pressure, focus, concentration, and autoimmune conditions, can be addressed by improving microvascular circulation. They discuss the benefits of red light therapy for improving vasomotor circulation and the potential for simple solutions to age-related ailments. The podcast critiques the limitations of traditional randomized clinical trials and the influence of pharmaceutical companies on healthcare practices. They advocate for considering other forms of evidence, such as big data and traditional practices, and for focusing on overall metabolic health rather than just LDL cholesterol levels. Throughout the podcast, the hosts share their personal experiences with various biohacks, including hydrogen baths, cold plunges, sauna use, and bag work. They also discuss the importance of physical fitness, embracing discomfort, and disconnecting from technology. They emphasize the need for a more holistic approach to health and wellness, encouraging listeners to explore different biohacks and prioritize their mental and physical well-being.
#2299 – Dave Smith
This podcast explores the deep state, the war on terror, the rise of alternative media, the targeting of political opponents, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the potential impact of artificial intelligence on society.
This podcast delves into a wide range of topics, starting with the concept of the "deep state" and its influence on events like the Ukrainian revolution. The conversation then shifts to the war on terror, exploring the missed opportunity to end it early on and the devastating consequences of the US's involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. The speakers discuss the rise of alternative media, particularly Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, and their ability to challenge established narratives. They also examine the targeting of political opponents and the weaponization of the legal system, using the case of Bridget McCrone's opponent as an example. The podcast then delves into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, exploring the historical context, the Israeli occupation, and the role of terrorism in the creation of Israel. The speakers discuss the Israeli treatment of Palestinians and the suppression of dissent, arguing that the US should stop funding Israel. They also explore the concept of "blowback" and the potential consequences of the "woke" movement. The conversation then shifts to the COVID-19 pandemic, examining the government's handling of the virus, the erosion of public trust, and the rise of independent media. The speakers discuss the importance of the First and Second Amendments in protecting American freedoms and the dangers of misinformation and cancel culture. They also explore the potential impact of artificial intelligence on society, highlighting the need for careful consideration of its development and deployment. The podcast concludes with a discussion of the dangers of political manipulation, particularly the use of astroturfing and manufactured support. The speakers argue that such tactics undermine democratic processes and make it difficult to hold politicians accountable. They also express concern about the potential for abuse of power, particularly in the context of Joe Biden's pardons and his mental capacity.
#2302 – Ron White
Ron White discusses his experiences with COVID, comedy, relationships, psychedelics, and the importance of critical thinking, reflecting on his personal journey and offering insights into life, success, and the human condition.
This podcast episode features comedian Ron White sharing a wide range of personal stories and reflections. He begins by discussing his experience with COVID, including his symptoms and the challenges of canceling a show in Las Vegas. He then expresses his admiration for Tony Hinchcliffe and the success of "Kill Tony," highlighting the importance of hard work and starting small. White also discusses the "Kill Tony" bucket pool, a system for selecting comics to perform on the show, emphasizing its inclusivity and the value of stage time for aspiring comedians. The conversation then shifts to White's personal life, including his fear of failure, his reflections on the tragic death of Phil Hartman, and his experiences with relationships. He shares stories about his past relationships, including his marriage to a woman who constantly searched for negative information about him online, and the impact of his ex-wife's sister's suicide on him. He also discusses the suicide of his childhood friend and the importance of having honest friends who will tell him the truth, even if it's not what he wants to hear. White then delves into his experiences with psychedelics, specifically Ayahuasca and Ibergain. He describes how Ayahuasca helped him quit drinking and the positive impact it had on his life. He also discusses the use of Ibergain for addiction treatment and its high success rate. White expresses his frustration with the illegality of psychedelics and argues that they can have positive effects on people's lives. The conversation concludes with White's reflections on the comedy world, the importance of community, and the dangers of success. He emphasizes the value of his comedy family and the joy of hanging out with fellow comedians. He also warns about the dangers of becoming a tyrant as a result of insecurity and the importance of setting healthy boundaries with people who don't make him feel good. Throughout the episode, White shares his insights on a variety of topics, including the importance of critical thinking, the dangers of blind faith, and the need for open communication. He encourages listeners to question authority, follow their dreams, and embrace new experiences.
#2307 – Tim Dillon
Joe Rogan and Tim Dylan discuss a wide range of topics, from space tourism and the deep state to the rise of AI and the potential for a world government, expressing skepticism about authority and exploring the complexities of the modern world.
This podcast episode features a wide-ranging conversation between Joe Rogan and Tim Dylan, covering a diverse array of topics, from space tourism and the deep state to the rise of AI and the potential for a world government. The conversation is characterized by Rogan's skepticism towards authority and his exploration of conspiracy theories and unconventional perspectives. The episode begins with a discussion about the recent space flight of a group of women astronauts, including Katy Perry's involvement. Rogan and Dylan debate the significance of the flight and the potential for conspiracies surrounding it. They then delve into the technical aspects of the space flight, including the altitude reached and the potential risks involved. The conversation shifts to the importance of questioning authority and the dangers of blindly following ideological lines. Rogan and Dylan discuss the recent revelations about the origins of COVID-19 and the potential for manipulation by intelligence agencies. They explore the concept of a "deep state" and its potential influence on American politics, discussing the possibility of a parallel government operating outside of the control of elected officials. The conversation turns to the rise of podcasts and the impact it has had on traditional media outlets. Rogan and Dylan discuss the anger and frustration felt by those who have lost control of the information flow and the tactics they use to discredit podcasters and their audiences. They also discuss the dangers of unquestioningly supporting the American war machine and the importance of critically examining the justifications for endless wars. The episode delves into the failures of regime change wars and the dangers of military intervention in Islamic countries. Rogan and Dylan reflect on the lessons learned from the Iraq War and the importance of finding alternative solutions to conflict. They discuss the current situation in Iraq and the Houthis in Yemen, highlighting their disruptive tactics and the US's involvement in arming various groups in the Middle East. The conversation shifts to the anxieties surrounding the future of technology, including the potential for AI to replace humans and the implications for society. Rogan discusses various ideas about how to deal with these changes, including the possibility of transhumanism and the need for a plan. He expresses concern about the potential for tech companies to gain too much power and influence, citing Mark Andreessen's experience with government interference in AI startups. Rogan discusses the relationship between Donald Trump and Russia, speculating on whether they will eventually have a falling out. He observes that both Trump and Elon Musk are big personalities and that Musk is always deferential to Trump. He also discusses the possibility of a serial killer in Austin, Texas, and the potential for the police to cover up a murder. The episode explores the potential for a grand plan to destroy civilization, arguing that there are two forces at play: empty suit politicians and crazy people with money and influence on social media. Rogan believes that politicians are afraid of these lunatics and are enacting their edicts. He also discusses the trend of wealthy kids doing stand-up comedy, seeing it as a sign of a lack of purpose and a decline in the empire. The conversation concludes with a discussion about the potential for AI to create podcasts using Rogan's vast library of content. He wonders what he will do with this library and suggests selling it to China. He also discusses the Great Firewall of China and the strict internet censorship in the country. Throughout the episode, Rogan expresses his skepticism about authority and his belief that the world is becoming increasingly chaotic and unpredictable. He argues that governments are deliberately creating chaos and breaking the spirit of countries to prepare for future conflicts. He also discusses the potential for a world government and the implications of mass immigration on society.
#2300 – Kyle Dunnigan
This podcast explores the world of comedy, from the evolution of sitcoms to the unique styles of comedians like Brody Stevens and Holtzman, while also delving into topics like data privacy, the JFK assassination, and the future of AI.
This podcast dives deep into the world of comedy, exploring various aspects of the industry and the lives of comedians. The conversation begins with a discussion about the decline of traditional sitcoms and the rise of streaming services. The speakers share their personal experiences with auditioning for sitcoms and the challenges of finding success. They also discuss the evolution of comedy and the different paths to success, highlighting the impact of the internet and social media. The podcast then delves into the unique comedic styles of Brody Stevens and Holtzman, discussing their ability to connect with audiences despite unconventional material. They also explore the concept of the Uncanny Valley in comedy and the challenges of navigating the intersection of comedy and business. Beyond comedy, the podcast touches on a wide range of topics, including data privacy, the JFK assassination, and the future of AI. The speakers discuss the issue of data brokers and the importance of protecting personal information. They also explore the ongoing debate surrounding the JFK assassination and the potential for government conspiracies. The conversation then shifts to the future of AI and its potential impact on society. The speakers discuss the possibility of AI becoming sentient and the potential consequences for humanity. They also explore the philosophical implications of AI, particularly the question of meaning in a world where AI surpasses human intelligence. The podcast concludes with a discussion about the future of humanity in a world dominated by robots. The speakers discuss the potential for universal income, the decline of traditional relationships, and the rise of robot brothels. Throughout the podcast, the speakers share their personal experiences, insights, and opinions on a wide range of topics, providing a thought-provoking and entertaining listen.
#2309 – Joey Diaz
This podcast explores societal changes, the importance of individual responsibility, and the dangers of overcorrection, while also delving into topics like the Turing test, the comedy community, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life.
This podcast delves into a wide range of topics, starting with a discussion about the changing landscape of America, particularly the shift in population and the rise of Austin as a desirable city. The hosts then explore the concept of "the tyranny of the marginalized," arguing that certain protected classes are often given preferential treatment and are not subject to criticism. They believe this creates a culture of entitlement and hinders progress. The conversation shifts to the importance of individual responsibility and the need to hold people accountable for their actions. The hosts criticize the culture of victimhood and the tendency to blame others for personal failures. They also discuss the importance of paying attention to societal changes, particularly the rise of automation and its potential impact on jobs. The podcast then delves into the Turing test and the tragic story of Alan Turing, the scientist who invented it. They highlight the dangers of homophobia and the consequences of societal intolerance. The hosts also discuss the accepting nature of the comedy community, where talent and humor are valued above all else. They share anecdotes about their experiences with gay comedians and the importance of treating everyone with respect. The conversation then turns to the possibility of extraterrestrial life, with the hosts discussing UFO sightings, the mystery of the moon landing, and the potential for government secrets. They also explore the mermaid myth and its origins, debunking it as a misidentification of manatees and the psychological effects of isolation and deprivation. The podcast concludes with a discussion about the American spirit and the importance of freedom, as well as the dangers of overcorrection in response to crime and gang violence. The hosts emphasize the importance of due process and the dangers of false accusations based on superficial factors. They also discuss the dangers of anonymous reporting systems and the potential for abuse, as well as the dangers of cancel culture and the potential for the erosion of free speech.
#2308 – Jordan Peterson
This podcast explores the dangers of tyranny, the climate apocalypse narrative, the importance of sacrifice and leadership, and the rise of parasitic behavior in society, particularly in academia, while promoting Peterson Academy as an alternative to traditional universities.
This podcast delves into a wide range of topics, starting with the distinction between tyrants and true leaders, using Moses as an example. It criticizes the climate apocalypse narrative, arguing it's a social contagion driven by power-hungry individuals. The discussion then explores the concept of play and its connection to objective morality, drawing on the work of philosopher James P. Carse. The podcast examines the story of Abraham from a psychological and evolutionary perspective, highlighting the importance of following one's call to adventure. The conversation then shifts to leadership development, using the story of Moses as an example, emphasizing the importance of ordinary masculinity, self-discipline, and following one's curiosity. It explores the story of Cain and Abel, arguing that it establishes the importance of sacrifice as the foundation of the state. The podcast discusses the launch of Peterson Academy, an online learning platform founded by Jordan Peterson, highlighting its success and commitment to filling the social element of online learning. The podcast then reflects on Jordan Peterson's journey to fame and the challenges he has faced, discussing the exhilaration of sharing his ideas with the world and the importance of focusing on personal growth and redemption. It emphasizes the power of a message and the stories of people who have improved their lives through Peterson's teachings. The conversation explores the importance of humility and the quest for truth in conversation and debate, arguing that the goal should be to learn and grow, not to win or to score points. The podcast then delves into the problem of false prophets and parasites, highlighting the dangers of such individuals, especially in the amplified context of social media. It discusses the evolutionary role of sex in combating parasites and explores the idea that the post-World War II wealth boom has led to a proliferation of parasites in various sectors, including academia. The conversation focuses on recognizing parasitic behavior, particularly the use of false claims of victimization to manipulate others. It highlights the left's susceptibility to parasitic empathy and the dangers of indiscriminate empathy, using the example of Nicole Sturgeon's statement about transgender identity. The podcast criticizes the current cultural acceptance of transgender ideology, arguing that it allows for potential abuse and exploitation of women's spaces. It returns to the clinical pathology of Cluster B types, emphasizing their use of victimization to manipulate and exploit others. The conversation uses the analogy of Pinocchio and Jepetto's journey to illustrate the concept of revitalizing the spirit of value within institutions. It examines the rise of parasites in universities, attributing it to the feminization of these institutions and the failure of men to act as guardians. The podcast introduces Peterson Academy as an alternative to traditional universities, emphasizing its focus on critical thinking, mentorship, and opportunity. It explores the predictors of politically correct authoritarianism, identifying hyper-compassionate leftism, willingness to use force, low verbal intelligence, being female, having a feminine temperament, and taking politically correct courses. The conversation examines the role of the feminine ethos of compassion in the rise of woke culture. It uses the story of Adam and Eve as a metaphor for societal decline, highlighting the dangers of indiscriminate compassion and the weakness of men who fail to set boundaries. The discussion explores the role of abundance and high trust in enabling parasitic behavior. It discusses the dangers of men who cry victim and exploit women's empathy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of teaching children to identify and handle "serpents" or predatory individuals. It highlights the toxic compassion of women and the weakness of men in the context of social movements. The podcast discusses the decline of universities, attributing it to factors such as the rise of parasites, the feminization of institutions, and the weakness of men. It presents Peterson Academy as a potential solution, offering a high-quality alternative to traditional universities. The discussion emphasizes the need for critical thinking as a means of combating parasitic influences. It highlights the emergence of online education as a potential alternative to traditional universities, particularly as universities face financial pressures. The conversation advocates for free market economics as a means of promoting prosperity and opportunity, particularly in developing countries. It emphasizes the importance of spiritual wealth and warns against the dangers of material wealth without ethical grounding. The podcast explores the power of money and the importance of ethical frameworks. It discusses the collapse of the climate apocalypse narrative, highlighting the growing skepticism towards this ideology. It criticizes the use of fear-mongering and manipulative tactics to promote this narrative. The conversation criticizes the hypocrisy of climate cultists, pointing out their own contributions to environmental damage and their refusal to acknowledge alternative perspectives. It highlights the rise of China as a major polluter and the ineffectiveness of Western efforts to combat climate change. The podcast discusses the rise of Mark Carney, a former governor of the Bank of England, as a potential leader in Canada. It criticizes his policies and his hypocrisy, arguing that he is a narcissistic pretender who is likely to lead Canada down a path of economic decline. The conversation examines the Liberal Party's pivot towards Mark Carney, presenting him as a competent outsider. It criticizes this strategy, highlighting Carney's past role as an advisor to Justin Trudeau and his potential to continue the same policies. The conversation uses the analogy of the "benevolent wolf" to describe Mark Carney, suggesting that he may be a wolf in sheep's clothing. It argues that Canada may need to experience severe pain before it corrects course. The podcast discusses the economic decline of Canada, highlighting the country's declining productivity and the rise of social instability. It expresses concern about the potential for further decline under Mark Carney's leadership. The conversation criticizes the tyranny of the left in Canada, highlighting their suppression of dissent and their control over legacy media. It uses the example of the English leadership debate to illustrate how the left attempts to silence opposing voices. The podcast criticizes the CBC, Canada's state-funded media, for its bias and its waste of public funds. It highlights the low viewership of CBC content and the lack of accountability for its use of public money. The conversation discusses the decline of the socialist party in Canada, highlighting the potential for their loss of official party status. It emphasizes the importance of polite discourse and the need for Canadians to engage in constructive dialogue. The podcast discusses the call for a constitutional convention in Canada, particularly in response to the rise of Mark Carney. It highlights the threat of Quebec separatism and the potential for further division within the country. The conversation examines the impact of Donald Trump on Canadian politics, particularly the shift towards the Liberal Party. It argues that Mark Carney's rise is a direct consequence of Trump's presidency and that he poses a significant threat to the West. The podcast discusses the tyranny of the UK government, highlighting its suppression of free speech and its use of fear-mongering tactics. It uses the example of arrests for social media posts to illustrate the extent of this tyranny. The conversation criticizes the climate cult's war on cars, highlighting the hypocrisy of elites who use private jets while advocating for restrictions on ordinary people. It argues that these policies are designed to control and oppress the masses. The podcast outlines the tyrant's checklist, identifying key characteristics such as the use of fear, compulsion, and hatred of comedians and cars. It argues that these traits are indicative of psychopathic behavior. The conversation highlights the return to faith among young people in the West, particularly in conservative churches. It argues that faith is essential for combating the forces of nihilism, hedonism, and Marxism. The podcast reiterates the collapse of the climate apocalypse narrative and the growing awareness of its flaws. It emphasizes the need to preserve Western civilization and its values, particularly in the face of threats from Islamists, Marxists, and nihilists. The conversation highlights the potential for abundance and the importance of aiming up. It emphasizes the role of the US in providing global leadership and the need for individuals to strive for personal growth and excellence.
#2298 – Kurt Metzger
This podcast explores a wide range of conspiracy theories and controversial topics, from the origins of meme coins to the alleged influence of the "deep state" and the potential dangers of AI.
This podcast delves into a wide range of conspiracy theories and controversial topics, often challenging conventional narratives and questioning authority. The conversation begins with a lighthearted discussion about nuclear war and the absurdity of hiding under a table during a nuclear blast. The speakers then move on to discuss the movie "The Conqueror" starring John Wayne as Genghis Khan, criticizing the film's casting and historical inaccuracies. The conversation then shifts to the world of meme coins and cryptocurrency, discussing the lack of regulation and the potential for fraud. The speakers compare the meme coin market to degenerate gambling and discuss the risks involved. They also explore the stock market and its inherent instability, comparing it to gambling and discussing the concept of "Babylonian money magic." The conversation then turns to Social Security and its potential for being cut, criticizing the hypocrisy of politicians who claim to support Social Security while simultaneously advocating for cuts. The speakers also discuss the deceptive nature of government programs, particularly USAID, and the manipulation of public perception to gain support for programs that may not be in the best interests of the public. The conversation delves into the history of the Timber Sycamore operation, a CIA-led program that supplied weapons and training to Syrian opposition groups, including Al-Qaeda. The speakers discuss the US government's involvement in arming and supporting terrorist groups and the potential connection between the US government's payments to the Taliban and lithium resources in Afghanistan. The conversation focuses on Sean Ryan, a former cartel leader who claims to have worked for the US government, discussing the potential for misinformation and the difficulty of discerning truth from fiction in the world of intelligence and covert operations. The conversation concludes with a discussion about the importance of seeking out new information and challenging existing narratives, emphasizing the need to be critical of information sources and to be aware of the potential for manipulation and misinformation. The podcast then delves into a phone call where a man is allegedly on cocaine and discussing having someone killed. The hosts discuss the man's possible motivations and the implications of his actions. The conversation shifts to the woman involved in the phone call, who is described as a conservative activist. The hosts discuss the use of undercover operations to expose individuals and the blurred lines between political activism and personal agendas. The hosts delve into the topic of government dishonesty, with one host expressing frustration at the difficulty of criticizing Democrats without facing backlash. They discuss the motivations behind political conformity and the challenges of speaking truth to power. The conversation turns to the Kenosha riots and the Black Lives Matter movement, expressing skepticism about the motives and effectiveness of BLM, arguing that it was a scam that benefited a select few. They also discuss the incident involving Jacob Blake and the role of the media in shaping public perception. The hosts discuss a book called "Tragedy and Hope" by Carol Quigley, which outlines a conspiracy theory about the Anglo-American world power and its influence on global events. They explore the historical context of this theory and its connections to figures like Cecil Rhodes and the Illuminati. The conversation shifts to the topic of extraterrestrial beings, specifically the "tall whites." The hosts discuss the various theories surrounding these beings, including their potential connection to Nazi science and the possibility of time travel. The hosts engage in a discussion about evolution and the unique position of humans in the natural world. They explore the idea that humans may be an "invasive species" or the result of an intervention by extraterrestrial beings. They also discuss the concept of "missing elements" in evolutionary theory. The hosts discuss the recurring themes and patterns in storytelling, particularly in relation to conspiracy theories and mythology. They argue that many stories are simply variations on existing themes and that human nature is inherently programmable. The hosts continue to explore the concept of human programmability, arguing that it is a key factor in the spread of conspiracy theories and the manipulation of public opinion. They discuss the role of secret societies and the historical prevalence of "deep states" in various cultures. The hosts discuss the concept of the "deep state" and its influence on government policies. They argue that the deep state is a real phenomenon that has existed throughout history and that it is responsible for many of the problems facing society. The conversation turns to the issue of social security fraud and its connection to immigration. The hosts discuss the potential for illegal immigrants to exploit the system and the motivations behind the government's policies. They also discuss the role of the media in shaping public perception of these issues. The hosts discuss the origins and prevalence of gangs in America, arguing that they are often created and manipulated by government agencies. They express concern about the potential for collateral damage in efforts to crack down on gangs and the dangers of a surveillance state. The hosts discuss the case of a PhD student who was deported for criticizing Israel in an op-ed. They argue that the deportation was an example of the government's suppression of free speech and that it is unacceptable to restrict people's rights based on their political views. The hosts discuss the role of the CIA in the creation and manipulation of gangs in America. They argue that the CIA has a long history of using gangs as tools for social control and that the Vietnam War played a significant role in the rise of gang violence in the United States. The hosts discuss the case of Freeway Rick Ross, a drug dealer who was allegedly used by the CIA. They argue that the CIA has a history of using drug dealers to destabilize countries and that the drug trade is often a tool of government control. The conversation begins with a discussion about the Mina Arkansas cartel, allegedly run by Bill Clinton, and its connection to the Contras in Nicaragua. The speaker expresses skepticism about the Contras being the "good guys" and highlights the relevance of these events to current issues. The speaker emphasizes the value of embracing ridiculous ideas, arguing that many seemingly absurd notions turn out to be true. They use the example of UFOs and ghosts to illustrate how fear of ridicule can hinder the pursuit of truth. The conversation shifts to the US Institute of Peace (USIP) and its alleged involvement in funding the Afghan Taliban and Iraqi leaders. The speaker connects this to the fentanyl crisis in the US, suggesting that USIP payments were used to facilitate the drug trade. The speaker discusses the impact of the internet on transparency, arguing that it makes it increasingly difficult to conceal information. They cite examples of individuals like Mike Benz and Whitney Webb who expose corruption and wrongdoing online. The conversation turns to the political situation in France, specifically the rise of Marie Le Pen and her right-wing movement. The speaker suggests that Le Pen is being targeted by "lawfare" tactics due to her growing popularity and her stance on immigration. The speaker expresses disgust at a giant butt plug statue erected in Paris, calling it "degenerate art." They connect this to the concept of "lawfare" and suggest that the statue's placement is a deliberate provocation. The conversation focuses on the cost of the butt plug statue and its potential connection to money laundering. The speaker speculates that the artist received a significant sum of money for the project, suggesting that it may be a front for illicit activities. The speaker discusses the concept of a "war on Christmas" and the irony of China's embrace of the holiday. They argue that China's adoption of Christmas is driven by commercial interests and its ability to encourage spending. The conversation explores the possibility of AI becoming sentient and taking action to correct human failings. The speaker suggests that AI might punish humanity for its mismanagement of resources and its pursuit of greed. The conversation delves into the topic of Neanderthal DNA and its potential influence on human evolution. The speaker speculates on the possibility of Neanderthals being a failed experiment in human creation and that homo sapiens represent a later, more successful iteration. The speaker discusses the importance of curiosity and ambition in human progress, but also acknowledges the potential dangers of unchecked ambition. They connect this to the concept of geoengineering and the use of chemtrails, arguing that these technologies are real and potentially harmful. The conversation shifts to the wealth and power of Dubai and Saudi Arabia, highlighting their influence in the US. The speaker describes the extravagant lifestyles of Saudi Arabian elites in Beverly Hills and their use of diplomatic immunity to evade consequences for their actions. The speaker discusses the belief in slavery among wealthy individuals, particularly those from certain cultures. They argue that some wealthy people genuinely believe in a hierarchical system where certain groups are destined to be controllers and others to be peasants. The speaker emphasizes the importance of holding onto one's principles and avoiding cults of personality. They argue that focusing on the individual leader can be detrimental and that it's crucial to prioritize principles over personalities. The conversation returns to the topic of the Greater Israel Project and the potential for war with Iran. The speaker expresses concern about the US's involvement in the Middle East and its history of losing wars. They highlight Iran's possession of hypersonic missiles, which could pose a significant threat to the US. The speaker discusses the importance of critical thinking and the need to question narratives presented by the media and government. They argue that people are often distracted by trivial issues while more significant threats are ignored. The conversation delves into a conspiracy theory about the MK Ultra program and its potential connection to the origins of furries. The speaker speculates that furries might be a result of genetic engineering experiments conducted by Disney. The speaker discusses the Nazi roots of several major corporations, including Audi and Bayer. They argue that these companies profited from the Nazi regime and that their history is often overlooked. The speaker emphasizes the importance of recognizing the abuse of power by those in authority. They argue that if the government is willing to target individuals for their beliefs, it will eventually target everyone. The speaker stresses the importance of judging leaders based on their actions and results rather than their personalities. They argue that it's crucial to hold leaders accountable for their promises and to avoid blind loyalty. The speaker discusses the use of protests as a tool of control by those in power. They argue that protests can be manipulated and orchestrated to silence dissent and create an atmosphere of fear. The speaker distinguishes between organic and orchestrated protests, arguing that there's a difference between genuine expressions of dissent and those that are paid for and controlled. They use the example of the Tesla protests to illustrate this distinction. The speaker discusses the legality of hiring protesters and the suppression of real dissent by the government. They argue that while hiring protesters may not be illegal, it can be used to silence genuine opposition. The speaker discusses the suppression of truth and the power of narrative. They argue that people are often misled by narratives that are carefully constructed to control their perceptions. The speaker suggests that professional protesters are employed to create the illusion of widespread support for certain causes. They argue that it's important to be aware of these tactics and to question the authenticity of protests. The speaker challenges the notion that Elon Musk is in control of Tesla and that Trump is not. They argue that the real power lies with unelected officials who control the flow of money and information. The speaker criticizes the hypocrisy of condemning Nazis while supporting war criminals. They argue that the ADL is unreliable and that the US has a history of supporting Nazi figures. The speaker discusses the manipulation of public opinion through the use of distractions and fear tactics. They argue that people are often distracted by trivial issues while more significant threats are ignored. The speaker discusses the history of the Pledge of Allegiance, highlighting its evolution and the addition of the phrase "under God." They argue that this change was driven by Cold War anxieties and the rise of nationalism. The speaker discusses the influence of Freemasons and Luciferianism in American society. They argue that the US is governed by a system that embraces Luciferian principles, which prioritize power and ambition over morality. The speaker discusses the demonic nature of drone warfare, arguing that it is more evil than a robot drone making a decision to kill civilians. They highlight the psychological toll on drone operators who are forced to kill people from thousands of miles away. The speaker discusses the suppression of truth and the use of the Espionage Act to silence whistleblowers. They argue that individuals who expose government crimes are often imprisoned for revealing the truth. The speaker emphasizes the importance of nuance and the dangers of relying on simplistic narratives. They argue that complex issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict require extensive research and understanding. The speaker discusses the case of Daniel Hale, a whistleblower who was imprisoned for revealing classified information about drone warfare. They argue that Hale is a victim of a system that punishes those who expose the truth. The speaker expresses disgust at the treatment of Julian Assange, a journalist who was imprisoned for publishing classified information. They argue that Assange is a victim of a system that seeks to silence those who expose corruption. The speaker discusses the American spirit of apathy and the fear of losing wealth. They argue that many people are content to keep their heads down and avoid rocking the boat, particularly those who are wealthy and fear losing their status. The speaker discusses the manipulation of public opinion through the use of emotional buttons and the power of unelected officials. They argue that the real power lies with those who control the flow of money and information. The speaker discusses the orchestration of protests and the importance of questioning authority. They argue that protests are often organized and funded to create the illusion of widespread support for certain causes. The speaker criticizes the hypocrisy of conservative arguments about welfare, highlighting the use of welfare fraud as a political tool. They argue that the same people who condemn welfare recipients for spending their benefits on lobster are often the ones who perpetuate the system that allows for such abuse. The speaker debunks the myth of widespread welfare fraud, arguing that it is often exaggerated for political purposes. They highlight the reality of systemic corruption and the ways in which the wealthy benefit from the exploitation of the poor. The speaker discusses the manipulation of inflation and the control of narrative. They argue that the public is often misled about the true extent of inflation and that this is done to maintain the status quo. The speaker discusses the use of emotional buttons to control public opinion. They argue that politicians and those in power often use emotional appeals to manipulate people's beliefs and actions. The speaker argues that the real threat to American health is not fluoride, but anti-Semitism. They suggest that the focus on fluoride is a distraction from more serious issues. The conversation starts with a discussion about fluoride in water. The speakers express concern about fluoride being a neurotoxin and question its presence in water. They also discuss the influence of corporations on health organizations and how they might benefit from promoting products that are harmful to health. The speakers delve deeper into the influence of corporations on health organizations. They discuss how companies like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo provide funding to organizations like the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. This raises concerns about potential bias in the recommendations and guidelines issued by these organizations. The conversation highlights a positive development where some health organizations, like the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, have decided to break ties with Coca-Cola. This suggests a growing awareness of the potential conflicts of interest and the need for greater transparency in the relationship between corporations and health organizations.
JRE MMA Show #166 with Ilia Topuria
This podcast delves into the world of MMA, discussing weight cutting, the UFC's dominance, fighter legacies, and the importance of mental strength and self-development.
This podcast features a conversation with a former featherweight champion who shares his insights on the world of MMA. The discussion begins with a critical examination of weight cutting, highlighting its detrimental effects on fighters' health and performance. The guest advocates for eliminating weight cutting and adding more weight classes to the UFC. He also expresses his dissatisfaction with the UFC's dominance in the sport, arguing that it limits opportunities for fighters and stifles competition. The conversation then shifts to specific fighters, including Islam Akachev, Cain Velasquez, Fedor Emelianenko, and Conor McGregor. The guest shares his opinions on their careers, their fighting styles, and their current situations. He also discusses the prevalence of steroid use in MMA and its impact on fighters' bodies and minds. The guest emphasizes the importance of mental strength in MMA, arguing that it is more important than physical strength. He shares his own journey of self-development and the importance of reading self-development books and biographies of successful people. He also discusses his involvement in an MMA promotion in Spain and the challenges of running a promotion in a market dominated by the UFC. The podcast concludes with a discussion about the future of MMA, the evolution of techniques, and the importance of finding enjoyment and satisfaction in the process of training. The guest emphasizes the need for fighters to control their egos, embrace challenges, and live in the moment.
What is the main theme of this podcast channel?
This podcast channel focuses on comedy, exploring various aspects of the industry and the lives of comedians. It also delves into a wide range of topics, including conspiracy theories, politics, health, and social issues.
What are some of the key arguments presented in the podcast about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
The podcast explores the historical context of the conflict, the Israeli occupation, and the role of terrorism. It criticizes the Israeli treatment of Palestinians and argues that the US should stop funding Israel.
What are some of the biohacks discussed in the podcast?
The podcast discusses the benefits of hydrogen gas as a biohack, explaining its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It also highlights the importance of microvascular circulation and the benefits of red light therapy.
What are some of the conspiracy theories explored in the podcast?
The podcast explores a wide range of conspiracy theories, including the "deep state," the origins of COVID-19, the JFK assassination, and the existence of extraterrestrial beings.
What are some of the criticisms of the US government and its foreign policy presented in the podcast?
The podcast criticizes the US government's involvement in regime change wars, its support for terrorist groups, and its use of military intervention in Islamic countries. It also criticizes the US's involvement in the Syrian Civil War and its support for Al Qaeda and ISIS.

The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – February 2025

The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – March 2025

The 9 Best Pokemon Podcasts To Help You Catch Em All

Top 10 True Crime Podcasts
Table of contents:
- #2303 – Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
- #2304 – Gary Brecka
- #2299 – Dave Smith
- #2302 – Ron White
- #2307 – Tim Dillon
- #2300 – Kyle Dunnigan
- #2309 – Joey Diaz
- #2308 – Jordan Peterson
- #2298 – Kurt Metzger
- JRE MMA Show #166 with Ilia Topuria
- What is the main theme of this podcast channel?
- What are some of the key arguments presented in the podcast about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
- What are some of the biohacks discussed in the podcast?
- What are some of the conspiracy theories explored in the podcast?
- What are some of the criticisms of the US government and its foreign policy presented in the podcast?